As I look back on a consultation appointment I had with a patient named Martin five years ago, I realize how poignant that conversation has become in recent years. Martin presented to my office for consultation after seeing multiple dentists, including a few periodontists. He had been told by a general dentist he saw that he had a “severe amount of bone loss” and was in need of deep cleanings. In addition, “many of his teeth needed to be extracted,” since the bone loss was advanced and the “teeth were beyond repair.”
Martin was shocked by his diagnosis and dismayed by the hopeless prognosis he received. With a background in research as well as a questioning mind, Martin began to familiarize himself with periodontics and treatment options other than extraction and implants. He soon sought consultation with periodontal specialists to see if saving his teeth were an option. Although he was told that many of his teeth could be saved with periodontal treatment, he was again told that all of his maxillary molars needed to be extracted, including the four mandibular anterior teeth. In addition to extraction and site preservation, bilateral sinus augmentation with subsequent implant treatment would be necessary. Prosthetic restoration included multiple single-unit implant crowns, a four-unit implant bridge in the anterior, and various other cosmetic restorations. He was given a treatment plan that would cost close to six figures.
ADDITIONAL READING | Manage, repair, or regenerate periodontal disease?
When Martin came to my office (Disclaimer: 30%–40% of my practice involves preparing for and/or placing implants), he had a simple question: Can you save my teeth? When I told him that I thought it was possible as long as he was going to put as much effort into saving his teeth as I would need to, he thanked me and said, “I guess they don’t teach saving teeth as a first therapeutic response in dental school, since almost everyone I saw wanted to place implants.” Martin is better at describing his story in his own words, but the following is the clinical part of his journey through periodontal treatment.
At presentation, Martin was in his fifties with a medical history significant for controlled hypertension with no known food or drug allergies. He had been lackadaisical with his dental care in the past because of his busy schedule, but he was motivated to get his hygiene and treatment under control. He denied a history of smoking/alcohol/drug use. Based on his full-mouth series (figure 1) and clinical presentation, Martin had generalized, moderate bone loss with localized, severe bone loss in the posterior maxillary right and left quadrants (figures 2a and 2b) as well as the mandibular anterior incisor area (figure 3).
After explaining treatment options, a plan that was focused on saving as many teeth as possible was fabricated. This included four quadrants of scaling and root planing, splinting the areas of severe bone loss (figure 4), osseous surgery with hard- and soft-tissue regeneration, extracting tooth No. 15 (complete bone loss to the apical extent of the root), and diligent maintenance intervals.
ADDITIONAL READING | Understanding and managing peri-implant bone loss
Briefly, during osseous surgery, the upper right molars were treated with a combination of autograft and platelet-derived growth factor/Beta-tricalcium phosphate along with a porcine collagen graft (figures 5a and 5b). The upper left osseous surgery consisted of the same treatment (figures 6a and 6b), but also included the extraction of a hopeless tooth No. 15. Once again, the anterior osseous surgery consisted of the same regenerative materials as the former surgeries but with the addition of a porcine soft-tissue graft (figures 7a, 7b, and 7c). After the initial healing phase, the patient was placed on a strict home-care regimen and was seen every eight to 12 weeks for hygiene recare. The patient maintained excellent hygiene throughout the five-year follow-up period.
Today, five years after Martin was told that his maxillary molars and anterior incisors had to be removed, he has had a gain in bone levels (figure 8). He has had an increase in root coverage and keratinized tissue in the anterior incisal region (figure 9). In addition, he has no bleeding upon probing, probing depths of 2–3 mm (with the exception of a 4 mm probing distal to No. 3), and an overall gingival health that is far better than initial presentation (figures 10 and 11). After five years, I can now say to Martin, “Yes, it has been possible to save your teeth.”
MORE CLINICAL TIPS FROM DR. SCOTT FROUM . . .
'Help! My implant fell out!'vcybxsvqtvrtucybfawwrvasbeud
'How much do you charge for an implant? I just want to know the price!'
‘The implant you put in my mouth is now bleeding; what should I do?’
After a tooth extraction, are you guilty of chucking the tissue?vcybxsvqtvrtucybfawwrvasbeud
It's 10 p.m.; do you know where your patient's hemostasis is?
'If I choose the dental implant option, how long do you guarantee it?'
So you shot a lion and you are public enemy No. 1: Now what do you do?
Scott Froum, DDS, is a periodontist in private practice in New York City. He is the editorial director of Perio-Implant Advisory e-newsletter, as well as a contributing author for DentistryIQ and Dental Economics. Dr. Froum is a clinical associate professor at the New York University Dental School in the Department of Periodontology and Implantology, and a diplomate of the American Board of Periodontology. Contact him through his website at drscottfroum.com.